Board 5 (Hand rotated for convenience)
Vul: NS
Dlr: S
|
♠ |
2 |
||||
|
♥ |
Q8 |
||||
|
♦ |
A10762 |
||||
|
♣ |
AKQ82 |
||||
|
♠ |
K863 |
♠ |
J10984 |
||
|
♥ |
J932 |
♥ |
106 |
||
|
♦ |
K94 |
♦ |
QJ853 |
||
|
♣ |
74 |
♣ |
5 |
||
|
♠ |
AQ7 |
||||
|
♥ |
AK754 |
||||
|
♦ |
-- |
||||
|
♣ |
J10963 |
||||
NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST
1♥ Pass 2♣(?) Pass
(?)6♣ End
Opening Lead: C4, Result, Making 7!
Only one pair got to the slam on Board 5 last Thursday evening and even they got there the wrong way! First, they did not get to the cold Grand Slam that was a claimer on the opening lead, second they misbid the hand. South’s first response should have been 2♦, not 2♣. With 10 + points and two five card suits, you bid the higher ranking regardless of quality. North fell in love with a pretty suit instead of bidding the length. (I admit the clubs are prettier than the diamonds) Still, South had a real problem when North responded 2♣ as Blackwood was not possible inasmuch as a one Ace response would not tell South whether the Club Ace was missing. Remember, one of the rules for NOT using Blackwood is when you have a void in an unbid suit.
South’s actual choice of 6♣ was the best compromise he could devise. North now failed to use his imagination to realize that he had promised only a 10 count and that South had just bid a Small Slam missing the ♣AKQ and the ♦A and the ♥Q! A little thought would have had North bidding 7 with all of these extra important cards that South knew nothing about.
Now. How should the slam have been properly bid? Easy. South opens 1♥, North correctly responds 2♦ and South now shows a “top-of-the-wedge” hand by making a “high reverse” of 3♣. This should get North excited enough to Blackwood and in the process upgrade his ♥Q as a good working card and continue with 5NT when he finds that we have all four aces. Whichever K South shows with 5♦ has to be a good card for North and North should bid the almost certain Grand Slam.
\ So, South North
1♥ 2♦
3C 4NT
5H 5NT
6♦ 7♣
Pass
is an excellent auction.